brendanhaines/coaxpress
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

misc comments

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Brendan Haines 2024-12-01 14:12:20 -07:00
parent 4ba076d618
commit 7ac01ca387
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
README.md
View File

@ -28,10 +28,14 @@ Similarly increasing resolution after streaming data causes mayhem as well:
If I instead change the resolution to 1696x1710 immediately after power cycle and starting Vision Point (before streaming any data) then I get full resolution at nearly 500fps. If I instead change the resolution to 1696x1710 immediately after power cycle and starting Vision Point (before streaming any data) then I get full resolution at nearly 500fps.
![1732166650577](image/README/1732166650577.png) ![1732166650577](image/README/1732166650577.png)
For this screenshot I also set `PixelCorrectSetMode = Raw`. It looks like the black (and maybe white too) correction data is bad. For this screenshot I also set `PixelCorrectSetMode = Raw`. It looks like the black (and maybe white too) correction data is bad. If I don't do this there are large horizontal bars of dark/light across the image.
It is also interesting to note that there is a focus gradient vertically across the image. This makes sense since the sensor is physically slanted in the camera housing. I'm really not sure why they did this. It is also interesting to note that there is a focus gradient vertically across the image. This makes sense since the sensor is physically slanted in the camera housing. I'm really not sure why they did this.
If I set resolution to 640x200 (which based on the label I think should give me 8000fps) as the very first thing after connecting, then I do see an increase in frame rate to 1000fps. This isn't the 8000 I expect but indicates that frame rate should adjust automatically with resolution. If I set resolution to 640x200 (which based on the label I think should give me 8000fps) as the very first thing after connecting, then I do see an increase in frame rate to 1000fps. This isn't the 8000 I expect but indicates that frame rate should adjust automatically with resolution.
I'm now updating the firmware on the framegrabber from 4.9 to 4.11. The changelog indicates that "the FPS indicator is stable" as a change in 4.11 so maybe some of the FPS numbers I've been seeing so far are wrong. I'm now updating the firmware on the framegrabber from 4.9 to 4.11. The changelog indicates that "the FPS indicator is stable" as a change in 4.11 so maybe some of the FPS numbers I've been seeing so far are wrong.
## Cabling
Triggering the framegrabber with a 3V3 rising edge. I want to use isolated inputs because they're there so J1 pin 13 (DB25 pin 7) with J1 pin 17 (DB25 pin 9) as GND.